Borden Rhodes:
> <code>int gear {1...6} = 1;</code>
I think Walter said that Ranged Types are a "failed feature" of Pascal/Ada
lineage, but I don't agree and I think they are useful to increase code safety,
a possible syntax from yours:
typedef int { 1 ... 6 } Gear;
Using a struct with "alias this" and a struct invariant that enforces the
range, plus properties, is possible, but such struct:
- Doesn't act transparently as a int subclass;
- Syntax-wise it's longer to define;
- The invariant is not enforced in all situations.
struct Gear {
int g_ = 1;
this(int g) { this.g_ = g; }
invariant() { assert(this.g_ >= 1 && this.g_ <= 6); }
@property void g(int x) { this.g_ = x; }
@property int g() { return this.g_; }
alias g this;
}
Bye,
bearophile
