Trass3r wrote:
In the past template mixins were a neat special usecase of templates. Now with the "mixin template()" syntax they've become a separate thing because you can add special code for handling them, e.g. allowing them to add constructors to classes.The question is: what is their right to exist? Is there anything you can do with them you can't with string mixins (or vice versa)?
I've personally never seen a use for template mixins.
