> For instance, given your definiton of S, you could use > _traits/std.traits to check that the type that you're testing has a member > variable t. You could then check that S!(typeof(t)) was the same as the type > that you were testing. So, if you get particularly cunning about it, I believe > that it can be tested for in specific cases, but I don't believe that it can > be > done in any general way. >
Thanks Jonathan That is exactly what I had thought of doing. I was conscious that it may not be the cleanest way. Now that you are saying a cleaner way may not exist, I will go ahead and write the code. Regards - Cherry
