Sean Eskapp Wrote: > In cases where they are the same, for instance declaring: > const int x = oldX + 5; > > vs > > immutable int x = oldX + 5; > > Or in non-class, non-array function parameters, does it make a difference > which is used?
Use immutable, it documents the type better. And const items cannot be used as immutable parameters (value types don't have such restriction).