Mandeep Singh Brar <mand...@brars.co.in> wrote:
"This would be easily resolved if interfaces were known to be Objects. "
But shouldnt this be the case, because there would be nothing called as
an
Interface which can be pointed to; it would be an Object which is
implementing an
interface which is being pointed to. So shouldnt Interfaces be Objects
too.
Otherwise, wouldnt it defeat the purpose of having Object as the base
class for
everything.
Object is only the base class for all D classes. Interfaces may also
represent COM objects or C++ classes, which are not subclasses of Object.
--
Simen
