On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:53:22 -0500, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:36:29 Ary Manzana wrote:
On 2/3/11 10:29 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>
> I have noticed that, is that a bug? I always thought it strange, since
> outer is a keyword, that you need to do this.outer.
>
> -Steve
I don't think outer is a keyword.
It's not a keyword. It's a property of non-static inner classes. It's
like
length on an array. It's always there, but it's not a keyword.
You're right, it isn't. My text editor highlights it like it is, so I
just assumed...
My question still stands though, why the requirement to use this.outer
instead of just outer?
-Steve