Re: Idiomatic way to write a range that tracks how much it consumes

[Jon Degenhardt via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Monday, 27 April 2020 at 04:41:58 UTC, drug wrote:

27.04.2020 06:38, Jon Degenhardt пишет:

Is there a better way to write this?

--Jon

I don't know a better way, I think you enlist all possible ways - get a value using either `front` or special range member. I prefer the second variant, I don't think it is less consistent with range paradigms. Considering you need amount of consumed bytes only when range is empty the second way is more effective.

Thanks. Of two, I like the second better as well.