06.05.2020 09:24, data pulverizer пишет:
On Wednesday, 6 May 2020 at 05:44:47 UTC, drug wrote:
proc is already a delegate, so &proc is a pointer to the delegate,
just pass a `proc` itself
Thanks done that but getting a range violation on z which was not there
before.
```
core.exception.RangeError@onlineapp.d(3): Range violation
----------------
??:? _d_arrayboundsp [0x55de2d83a6b5]
onlineapp.d:3 void onlineapp.process(double, double, long,
shared(double[])) [0x55de2d8234fd]
onlineapp.d:16 void onlineapp.main().__lambda1() [0x55de2d823658]
??:? void core.thread.osthread.Thread.run() [0x55de2d83bdf9]
??:? thread_entryPoint [0x55de2d85303d]
??:? [0x7fc1d6088668]
```
confirmed. I think that's because `proc` delegates captures `i` variable
of `for` loop. I managed to get rid of range violation by using `foreach`:
```
foreach(i; 0..n) // instead of for(long i = 0; i < n;)
```
I guess that `proc` delegate cant capture `i` var of `foreach` loop so
the range violation doesn't happen.
you use `proc` delegate to pass arguments to `process` function. I would
recommend for this purpose to derive a class from class Thread. Then you
can pass the arguments in ctor of the derived class like:
```
foreach(long i; 0..n)
new DerivedThread(double)(i), cast(double)(i + 1), i, z).start();
thread_joinAll();
```
not tested example of derived thread
```
class DerivedThread
{
this(double x, double y, long i, shared(double[]) z)
{
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
this.i = i;
this.z = z;
super(&run);
}
private:
void run()
{
process(x, y, i, z);
}
double x, y;
long i;
shared(double[]) z;
}
```
