On Tuesday, 19 May 2020 at 20:51:01 UTC, Luis wrote:
I saw that they have postblit operator... But i don't understand exactly why. In special, when they implement InputRange over the containers, but having disabled postblit, make nearly useless (at least as I see on this old post https://forum.dlang.org/thread/n1sutu$1ugm$1...@digitalmars.com?page=1 )

You have to understand the memory management difference between EMSI-containers and regular D slices. A normal slice won't worry about freeing the memory used. It just assumes that either the garbage collector will take care of it (the usual case), or that the code will tell manually when the memory really needs to be freed (possibly by some other reference to the same memory).

EMSI-containers, however, are designed to free their memory after use themselves. They do it by the Resource Acquisition Is Initialization principle: when the container gets deleted, the underlying data gets freed right away.

This leads to that there must be only one container using the same memory. It would not do to make a copy of it, unless it's a deep copy (Deep copy means that also the underlying memory is copied. It tends to take long.). This is the reason that postblits are disabled in EMSI-containers. It wants to protect you from accidents. If you want to store the same container in many places, store references to it instead. And when iterating over it, you get the underlying range first, like Mike said. The underlying range can likely be copied freely.

Reply via email to