On 13/02/2011 21:34, Sean Eskapp wrote:
Is there a way to specify that a function is nonvirtual, but can still be "overriden" in base classes? e.g.
Then you're not overriding at all. You're just declaring a function in the derived class that happens to have the same name.
As such, it seems to me to have little use besides writing confusing code. Stewart.
