On Sunday, 10 January 2021 at 16:52:30 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I want to create my own Tuple type, and I don't like the messy
implementation of the one in D's standard lib, or the one in
Clang++'s standard lib. The concept is very simple so it is
disheartening if it cannot be done in a simple way that does
not impact compile times... :-/
The requirements are:
[...]
2. If all types are similar then it should be implemented as a
static array with indexing. If not, then all fields should have
the names __0, __1 etc.
Why are these particular implementation details important to you?
