On 2/25/11, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> wrote: > However, it is true that in this particular case, it's annoying. Still, in > the > general case, I do believe that it's definitely the right behavior. > > - Jonathan M Davis >
I do agree it's the right thing to do, and I wouldn't want to change it. But I'd like the compiler to be smart in this case and see that there's no way 128 will ever be stored into a byte. It's not some crucial piece of code that I need working. I just ran into it by accident really.
