On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:20:46 -0500, David Nadlinger <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 2/27/11 4:14 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
But here is essentially the way to do your thingy.
version(IDENT)
{
}
else version(IDENT2)
{
}
else
{
version=NOT_IDENT_OR_IDENT2;
}
version(NOT_IDENT_OR_IDENT2)
{
...
}
Wouldn't that be »!(IDENT || IDENT2)«, as opposed to »!IDENT || !IDENT2«?
David
Yes, my version is wrong. simendsjo's version is probably the only way to
do it. It's difficult to reason about negative booleans.
-Steve
