Simen kjaeraas: > It's probably correct that _adDupT is not nothrow. It is also wrong > that it shouldn't be.
I was about to write a bug report regarding allowing dupping in nothrow functions, because this is now allowed, and I think this is the same thing as doing a dup: nothrow void foo(int[] a) { auto b = new int[a.length]; b[] = a[]; } void main() {} Bye, bearophile