On 9/13/21 1:54 PM, eugene wrote:
On Monday, 13 September 2021 at 17:40:41 UTC, user1234 wrote:
The problems seems to lies in `newSignal()` which "would" not allocate
using the GC.
final Signal newSignal(int signum) {
Signal sg = new Signal(signum);
sg.owner = this;
sg.number = sg_number++;
sg.register();
return sg;
}
full src is here
http://zed.karelia.ru/0/e/edsm-in-d-2021-09-10.tar.gz
The GC only scans things that it knows about.
Inside your EventQueue you have this code:
```d
void registerEventSource(EventSource es) {
auto e = EpollEvent(0, es);
int r = epoll_ctl(id, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, es.id, &e);
assert(r == 0, "epoll_ctl(ADD) failed");
}
EventQueue opOpAssign(string op)(EventSource es)
if (("+" == op) || ("~" == op)) {
registerEventSource(es);
return this;
}
void deregisterEventSource(EventSource es) {
auto e = EpollEvent(0, es);
int r = epoll_ctl(id, EPOLL_CTL_DEL, es.id, &e);
assert(r == 0, "epoll_ctl(DEL) failed");
}
EventQueue opOpAssign(string op)(EventSource es)
if ("-" == op) {
deregisterEventSource(es);
return this;
}
```
And you are registering your signals using the `+=` operator.
What is happening here, is, `epoll_ctl` is adding your event source to a
*C allocated* structure (namely the epoll struct, allocated by
`epoll_create1`, and possibly even managed by the OS). The GC does not
have access to this struct, so if that's the only reference to them,
they will get cleaned up by the GC.
Now, with your stopper code that you showed, it looks like you are
storing the reference to stopper right on the main stack frame. This
*should* prevent those from being destroyed, since Stopper has a
reference to both signals.
But I would recommend using `core.memory.GC.addRoot` on your EventSource
when registering it with epoll, and using `core.memory.GC.removeRoot`
when unregistering. That will ensure they do not get cleaned up before
being unregistered. If this doesn't fix the problem, perhaps there is
some other issue happening.
-Steve
