I also should discourage its current form with large
`tupleSize`s. The computation is in O(exp(values.length)).
Instead of `~=` I would suggest an `std.array.appender` of arrays
instead of an 2D-array for the `choices`, if the `choices` become
large. Most efficient is a preallocated array capacity. In that
case `~=` has very low overhead.
- Array permutations Vino via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Array permutations jfondren via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Array permutations jfondren via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Array permutations Vino via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Array permutations Vino via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Array permutations Dukc via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Array permutations Elmar via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Array permutations Elmar via Digitalmars-d-learn