On 10/31/21 7:07 AM, Salih Dincer wrote:
> ```d
> auto foo(int value, auto s = Section(2, 60)) {
> int max; /* ^------- ?
> ... */
> return Section (0, max)
> }
> ```
> Is possible something like above pointed. OK, I know it isn't because I
> tried! Well, wouldn't it be nice if it did?
Makes sense because e.g. the following works:
struct S {
auto i = 42;
}
I bet the problem with your proposal is "auto" in that position is a
part of the two-word "auto ref" parameters. I don't know how hard or
impossible it would be to allow just "auto" there.
In any case, although it would be nice for completeness, the use case is
so rare that I wouldn't mind repeating the type twice in that usage. But
I agree with you...
Ali
