On Tuesday, 17 May 2022 at 09:38:31 UTC, Sergey wrote:
On Monday, 16 May 2022 at 17:32:20 UTC, Allen Garvey wrote:
I'm working on a comparison of WebAssembly performance for
error propagation dithering using D, C++ and Zig. So far C++
and Zig work as expected, but for D, despite using the same
algorithm and similar code the output is different.
Hm D version is the slowest one?!
It's faster than the JS version atleast. But yeah, C++ and Zig
being 30+% faster than the D solution doesn't look good on us :(
