On Friday, 17 June 2022 at 05:17:20 UTC, Tejas wrote:
On Friday, 17 June 2022 at 01:04:28 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:Nope. The way UFCS works is that allows you to call free functions using member-function syntax, and member-function syntax is always `object.memberName`, so UFCS only works for functions that have a name, not anonymous functions.Would it be worthwhile to extend the scope of UFCS to accomodate this use case as well though??
I think it would lead to a lot of confusing and ambiguity.
