On 7/13/22 02:25, Bagomot wrote: > How to do the same with `taskPool` instead of `spawnLinked`?
You are hitting the nail on the head. :) std.parallelism, which taskPool is a concept of, is for cases where operations are independent.
However, producer and consumer are by definition dependent, so it's a problem for std.concurrency, which involves message boxes.
You can do the same with std.parallelism or core.thread but you would be implementing some of what std.concurrency already provides.
The following are my understandings of these topics: http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/parallelism.html http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/concurrency.html http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/concurrency_shared.html The introduction section of the Concurrency chapter lists some differences. Ali
