On Wednesday, 13 July 2022 at 01:40:43 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 July 2022 at 01:23:35 UTC, D Lark wrote:
First, please can someone clarify if the behaviour I expect in
the last line is consistent with the intention of the library?
Yes, it should behave the way you expect. The current behavior
is a bug.
I've submitted a report for it here:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23242
It looks like the resolution is that this can't be fixed? I'm not
sure I understand the conclusion. What does this mean for this
part of the library then? Should the RandomAccessInfinite!E
interface be removed since it's not fully supported?
