Andrej Mitrovic Wrote: > Wow not a minute later and I get bitten by my own solution. A C > function returned 1 for a supported feature, and -1 otherwise. And of > course -1 got converted to true, so then I had a bug in my code. > > Damn silly C functions which return -1 when they should return 0. > > Or damn me for not RTFM'ing.
Yeah, so the reason it doesn't do that conversion is because it will bite you. Actually D already uses non-zero as true. Why do you need to cast it?