On 04/07/2011 03:32 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-04-07 12:25, spir wrote:
On 04/07/2011 10:20 AM, spir wrote:
Hello,
In D stdlib's ddoc the idiom "$(D some d code) is constantly used. But
it does
not work by me. Not only it's not interpreted, but the contents are
stripped
out all together. (A *very* big bug of ddoc.)
First, I'd like to know why.
Second, there is another pattern $(D_CODE some d code), but it place
the code
on a separate block. Is this intended?
Third, http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/ddoc.html seems to imply one
can define
new patterns. How to do that? I tried following the example, but my
code ends
up interpreted and stripped out.
OK found it: pattern defs must be places under a "Macro:" section title.
I take the opprtunity to ask another question: does anyone know how to
tag a *span* of text as literal/uninterpreted (either in html or css).
The issue is <pre> makes a *block*, even if not inside a <div> or <p>; I
desperately need the same feature for inline pieces of code.
Denis
Have a look at the CSS display property:
http://w3schools.com/css/pr_class_display.asp
Great, does the trick!
But is there else really no other way to suspend interpretation as <pre>? I
find this strange... how are we supposed to insert "code phrases" in the flow
of normal text?
Denis
--
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com