On Sunday, 29 December 2024 at 15:15:28 UTC, Andy Valencia wrote:
On Saturday, 28 December 2024 at 23:23:02 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
The spec would need to drastically improve before my opinion
changes; Im also uninterested practicing withholding my
opinions.
There are many many ancient bugs, that you need to inherent
implicit knowledge to navigate, either those a) should
actually be fixed or b) the spec should make such knowledge
explicit
On the other hand, I'd characterize the language as very nicely
designed,
Where that is true, I doubt the spec was involved. The spec
bullet points look like compiler peusdo code or formalizing
wontfix bugs while burying the lead.
Just recently a submitted a bug on Phobos, which was quickly
and kindly narrowed down to something else (changed ldc2
default).
I hope you can find a way to get the flaws you've found
incorporated.
At this point if I found a bug I needed fixed id complain to adr,
and even then I assume ill find a bug with templates once a week
after leaving the garden path.
