On Thursday, 8 May 2025 at 04:51:27 UTC, Andy Valencia wrote:
Thank you. I want to work in strings, so the first one's not an option. But both the second and third do the trick. Would you say the to!string would be the most idiomatic? It worked as "to!string(ctime(&t))", but is it safe to assume it's reliably dealing with null-terminated strings? It's the pithiest if so.Andy
Yes, it'safe to assume: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/blob/12bcacca2a590942e1b917daaa8732a509b2ef30/std/conv.d#L1087
