On Saturday, 26 July 2025 at 23:08:35 UTC, luafyn wrote:
Why doesn't this work?

```d
import std;

struct Optional(T)
{
    T value;
    bool hasValue;
}

auto map(alias fn, T)(Optional!T m)
{
    alias U = ReturnType!fn;

In this case, an untyped function literal (`it => 123`) is actually a template function (pointer) and there is no way for the compiler to infer what the type of `fn` should be for `ReturnType!fn`.

monkyyy's solution is fine, though I'd probably write this:
```d
    alias U = typeof(fn(m.value));
```

    if (m.hasValue) {
        return Optional!U(fn(m.value), true);
    } else {
        return Optional!U();
    }
}

void main()
{
    auto x = Optional!string("123", true);
    auto y = x.map!(it => 123);
    writeln(y);
}
```

Error:

```d
onlineapp.d(11): Error: template instance `onlineapp.main.ReturnType!(__lambda_L23_C21)` does not match template declaration `ReturnType(alias func)`
  with `func = __lambda_L23_C21(__T1)(it)`
  must satisfy the following constraint:
`       isCallable!func`
    alias U = ReturnType!fn;
              ^
onlineapp.d(23): Error: template instance `onlineapp.main.map!((it) => 123, string)` error instantiating
    auto y = x.map!(it => 123);
              ^
```

This error message makes noooooo sense to me. At all. It's gibberish. How is a lambda not callable?! This is really frustrating, as something that works *absolutely trivially* in any other language.

The problem is `isCallable` (in the general case) cannot detect template functions that are instantiable with IFTI. The docs for it were updated earlier in the month but are currently only on the prerelease version:

https://dlang.org/phobos-prerelease/std_traits.html#isCallable

In Phobos 3 `isCallable` will likely be replaced. I think when it was made to support some templates with `!()`, that muddied the waters. It would make sense IMO (possibly with another name) if it only worked with functions, delegates and types with `opCall`.

Also Steven Schveighoffer [has proposed](https://forum.dlang.org/post/dtxmsbsrxtguvyzpp...@forum.dlang.org) `__traits(canCall, expression)` which if implemented would be a much better alternative to using `isCallable` in a template constraint.

It's something that I've ran against with D time and time again: I get an inscrutable error or problem that is only solved by “just” knowing the right incantation to use, anytime I try to do something even slightly unorthodox, and it makes D really annoying to use if you’re new to it.

It's interesting to see problems like that, there may be ways to improve the language/compiler error messages/Phobos or the docs to help with these.

Reply via email to