On 2011-07-21 13:09, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
Have a look at Orange: http://www.dsource.org/projects/orange
I'm in a middle of a complete rewrite but you can use a previous version
(if it still works) or look at the code.
Thank you for pointing me there. Looks very interesting. I took a quick look
at the code and got some questions. I found this pattern quite often in
phobos sources, too.
Why do you declare in Reflection.d[1] a template
parameterNamesOf(alias func) and one called parameterNamesOfImpl? Wouldn't
be one sufficient?
I do understand the case if you want to use the template recursively and
hide one parameter like in fieldsOf / fieldsOfImpl.
Though I don't understand why you are using a recursive template in fieldsOf
and a imperative function in parameterNamesOfImpl? Is it possible to you use
both in both places?
[1] http://www.dsource.org/projects/orange/browser/orange/util/Reflection.d
The thought behind that was that I wanted to force the function to be
used at compile time. But now when I think about it you could just
declare the argument as a template argument on the regular function.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
