On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:54:54 -0400, Diego Canuhé <canuh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
isn't that the way it's supposed to work? I mean
void show(int a) { writeln(a); }
void main() { show(null); }
won't compile either.
Shouldn't bar be some kind of pointer?
null should be considered as the type of the class, not void *. You
should not be able to override the behavior of opAssign as it pertains to
assigning to a class instance. In other words, you should *never* be able
to override x = null where x is a class instance.
btw, today I read "opAssign can no longer be overloaded for class
objects"
here:
http://www.d-programming-language.org/features2.html
is that no longer valid?
Here is the spec. I would not trust that features2, it's probably out of
date.
http://www.d-programming-language.org/operatoroverloading.html#Assignment
-Steve
