On 2011-08-13 02:59, maarten van damme wrote:
Are you really working on a better htod?

Yes, I guess so.

will it try to convert ifdefs in version()?

I don't know yet. I'm avoiding the preprocessor for as long as I can.

2011/8/12 Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com <mailto:d...@me.com>>

    On 2011-08-12 13:48, Trass3r wrote:

        Am 12.08.2011, 13:35 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com
        <mailto:d...@me.com>>:

            On 2011-08-12 11:36, simendsjo wrote:

                htod is a fork of dmc or something, right? How difficult
                is it to update
                the program to make it more user friendly?
                Is the source public? Would it be better to use gcc or
                clang instead?
                htod is a great thought, but I haven't either gotten it
                to work for
                anything but the simplest cases.


            I'm working on a tool to convert C header files to D modules
            based on
            clang. But currently it's not a prioritized project.


        I also played with the idea. Clang's Rewrite facilities should be
        perfect for that.


    Yeah, I'm using Rewrite, if I recall correctly.

    --
    /Jacob Carlborg




--
/Jacob Carlborg

Reply via email to