On 2011-08-13 02:59, maarten van damme wrote:
Are you really working on a better htod?
Yes, I guess so.
will it try to convert ifdefs in version()?
I don't know yet. I'm avoiding the preprocessor for as long as I can.
2011/8/12 Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com <mailto:d...@me.com>> On 2011-08-12 13:48, Trass3r wrote: Am 12.08.2011, 13:35 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com <mailto:d...@me.com>>: On 2011-08-12 11:36, simendsjo wrote: htod is a fork of dmc or something, right? How difficult is it to update the program to make it more user friendly? Is the source public? Would it be better to use gcc or clang instead? htod is a great thought, but I haven't either gotten it to work for anything but the simplest cases. I'm working on a tool to convert C header files to D modules based on clang. But currently it's not a prioritized project. I also played with the idea. Clang's Rewrite facilities should be perfect for that. Yeah, I'm using Rewrite, if I recall correctly. -- /Jacob Carlborg
-- /Jacob Carlborg