Kagamin Wrote: > these fail because Random is a struct an its state is precisely replicated on > copy, so two calls to randomCover accept gen in the same state, so their > outputs are identical. All arr1, arr2, str1 and str2 are equivalent.
Yes, I found that. But the question remains, is it a bug. As I said reuse of a generator is good to allow random behavior throughout the program, but reproducible behavior throughout each run. RandomCover is a very useful for selecting all options of a range. But you must create a new generator every-time to get random behavior from sequential calls.
