Am 29.11.2011, 20:41 Uhr, schrieb Marco Leise <marco.le...@gmx.de>:
Am 29.11.2011, 14:53 Uhr, schrieb bearophile <bearophileh...@lycos.com>:
deadalnix:
No it has nothing to do with this bug.
I tend to agree.
But actually, this exemple should
generate a warning at least, or being illegal eventually.
I'd like that code to loop on all array 256 items once, and then stop
:-)
Bye,
bearophile
Is it evil if I propose that 'i' should always be size_t and nothing
else?
Yes, because you can iterate over -10..10 as well -.-
