On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 16:37, clk <c...@clksoft.com> wrote: > Philippe, > Thank you very much for your response. It looks similar to what I've done > in javascript by wrapping all function arguments into a single object > literal but the D alternative you propose is a little to convoluted for a > beginner like me. Perhaps I'll understand it better after I'm done reading > the D book.
Oh yes, it *is* convoluted :) What I was proposing is to try and code it myself, if others find the resulting syntax acceptable. I wouldn't know, since I do not use named arguments myself.
