Jonathan M Davis: > The feature is new, so it doesn't > yet work in all of the cases that it should, and it's not entirely clear > exactly far it will go. IIRC, Daniel Murphy and Steven were discussing it a > while back,
I have very recently opened another thread about it, but unfortunately it didn't attract a lot of attention: http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=153041 > and it wasn't > entirely clear that it ever would beacuse of the increased complications > involved. Yeah. -------------------- Ali: > return s ~ '.'; > > as the type of the result is const(char)[]. I insist that it too should > be castable to any mutable or immutable type. Add a request in Bugzilla if it's not already present. I don't know how much complex it is to implement in the compiler. Bye, bearophile