On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 01:24:13PM -0800, H. S. Teoh wrote: [...] > This is ambiguous, since you could interpret 0xFFp0F as either 0xFFp0 > followed by the suffix 'F', or 0xFFp0F with an exponent of 0x0F no > suffix. [...]
Actually, nevermind that. I misread the specs; the exponent is always in decimal, not hex, so this case is actually unambiguous. T -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
