On 02/25/2012 07:23 PM, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 02/25/12 15:37, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/25/2012 03:32 PM, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 21/02/2012 17:46, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-02-21 16:55, deadalnix wrote:
<snip>
You can implement a static opCall and use that instead of the
constructor.
But you don't have to call a static opCall. You can just declare a
struct instance without any initialisation. Presumably half the point is
to ensure that exceptionBuilder is still initialised in such cases.
Stewart.
struct exceptionBuilder{
@disable this();
@disable enum init=0;
static exceptionBuilder opCall(...){...}
}
Too bad this doesn't work when opCall takes args.
IOW, "S(2)" results in
Error: constructor m.S.this () is not callable using argument types (int)
Error: constructor m.S.this is not callable because it is annotated with
@disable
Error: expected 0 arguments, not 1 for non-variadic function type ref S()
Removing the disabled 'this()' makes the error go away and the right
opCall() gets called.
artur
Well, that is a bug.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6036
