Le vendredi 24 février 2012 à 13:00 -0800, H. S. Teoh a écrit : > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 09:35:57PM +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote: > > Al 24/02/12 20:45, En/na H. S. Teoh ha escrit: > [...] > > > I personally think that phobos *should* be a shared object at some > > > point, but not everyone agrees with me. > > > > > > > I think that phobos should be a shared object too, but only when it > > has some sense (by now, every dmd release breaks previous libraries, > > at least gtkd ones) > [...] > > I suppose D/Phobos is currently still too volatile to start committing > to shared library version numbers yet. One *could* in theory start doing > it and just end up with very large version numbers, which the system in > theory can handle just fine, although people seem aversive to the > possibility of having /usr/lib/libphobos.so.2.x for all x from 0 to some > very large number. > > > T >
ldc build already phobos / druntime as shared lib with /usr/lib/libphobos.so.2.x /usr/lib/libphobos.so.2 /usr/lib/libphobos.so.2 and same for druntime