On 29 February 2012 19:30, simendsjo <simend...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:03:30 +0100, Mike Parker <aldac...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2/29/2012 1:10 AM, simendsjo wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:58:13 +0100, Trass3r <u...@known.com> wrote: >>> >>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570 >>> >>> >>> Thanks. I've literally spent hours testing various things without any >>> luck - would have been simpler if I knew asm :/ >>> >>> A blocker for using x64 on linux then. >> >> >> Have you tested on 32-bit yet? I had the exact same problem with one of my >> wrappers when passing a struct by value, but on 32-bit Windows. Luckily, in >> my case it was simple enough to implement the function in D to work around >> it. I'm curious to know if it's related. > > > Yes. Tested on x32, and it works just fine. I'll use ia32libs and -m32 for > the time being then. > > A strange thing is that memory consumption went _up_ when everything was > compiled as x32.
I don't know much, but wouldn't bigger register sizes mean that less data needs shuffled in and out of memory? Resulting in less instructions and therefore less memory usage? I'm just guessing though -- James Miller
