On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:42:53PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote: [...] > The current solution encourages correct usage (or at least usage which > is closer to correct, since it still isn't at the grapheme level) > without disallowing more optimized code. [...]
Speaking of graphemes, is anyone interested in implementing Unicode normalization for D? I looked at the specs briefly, and it seems to be something that is straightforward to implement, albeit somewhat tedious. It would be nice if D string types are normalized (needs slight change to string concatenation). Or at least, if there's a guaranteed normalized string type for those who care about it. T -- You have to expect the unexpected. -- RL
