On 4/9/12, Artur Skawina <art.08...@gmail.com> wrote: > However, there's no reason why *std.stdio* should expose the raw printf > function - i didn't even realize it did until now... > It either shouldn't be available via std.stdio at all, or something > like this wrapper should be added there, to catch the inevitable mistakes:
I think most mentions of printf should just be removed from the dpl docs except maybe a few special places. People (or rather C++ refugees) seem to expect D to be a syntax sugared version of C++, but this myth has to be busted.