On Saturday, April 14, 2012 09:58:42 F i L wrote: > On Saturday, 14 April 2012 at 06:29:40 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: > > On 04/13/2012 09:00 PM, F i L wrote: > > > default is NaN > > > > Just to complete the picture, character types have invalid > > initial values as well: 0xFF, 0xFFFF, and 0x0000FFFF for char, > > wchar, and dchar, respectively. > > > > Ali > > That's interesting, but what effect does appending an invalid > char to a valid one have? Does the resulting string end up being > "NaS" (Not a String)? Cause if not, I'm not sure that's a fair > comparison.
You can't append a char to a char. You can append them to strings, but not each other. Appending an invalid char results in a string with an invalid char. It won't blow up on its own. But any function which attempts to decode the string (which includes the vast majority of functions which would be called on a string) would result in a UTFException. So, you'll generally know that you have a bad string very quickly. - Jonathan M Davis
