On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 17:10 -0400, Matt Soucy wrote: [...] > If you merge the two foreach loops into one, doing t.start();t.join(); > it doesn't have this issue. Also, when I run your code repeatedly the > number of successful numbers printed changes a lot. > I'm assuming that you're trying to join a thread that already exited...
This matches with Artur's comment about laziness/strictness, but doing the above is only useful for experimentation, it cannot be a final solution since it enforces serialization of thread execution. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
