Another idea: instead scope, "in" can get a new functionality.
Instead as a synonym for "const" it could mean "not null" for
objects.
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++? Ali Çehreli
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++? Namespace
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++... Ali Çehreli
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++... Namespace
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++... Timon Gehr
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++... Namespace
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++... Timon Gehr
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++... Namespace
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++... Timon Gehr
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++... Namespace
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++... Namespace
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++... bearophile
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++... Namespace
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++... bearophile
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++... Namespace
- Re: Aquivalent References as in C++? bearophile