On Friday, 20 April 2012 at 14:18:37 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 20.04.2012 18:10, Xan wrote:
What fails if I want to define this:
Algorisme!(T,V) opBinary(string op)(Algorisme!(T,U) alg) {
Algorisme!(T,V) opBinary(string op, T)(Algorisme!(T,U) alg) {
You need to name what T is and that is *sometype*. Anyway I
suggest getting a decent book (TDPL).
if (op=="*") {
static if is conceptually and technically better here.
Thanks, Dmitry, for your suggestions, but it does not work too:
$ gdmd-4.6 algorisme
algorisme.d:54: Error: 'alg' is not of arithmetic type, it is a
algorisme.Algorisme!(int,int).Algorisme
algorisme.d:54: Error: 'alg2' is not of arithmetic type, it is a
algorisme.Algorisme!(int,int).Algorisme
I update de gist: https://gist.github.com/2429005
By the other hand, is there any way to put the definition of
operator * in the class (not out like I have now)?
Thanks,
Xan.
