On Sunday, 27 May 2012 at 17:00:01 UTC, maarten van damme wrote:
ok, can't seem to reproduce the crashing. now on to optimizing
my
sieve a bit more ,9 miliseconds for 1_000_000 is still to slow.
--
Er is zon buiten. Zonnige zondag namiddag met priemgetallen in
de
plaats van buiten zitten. Tss tss. :-)
hoe? wie? x)
Have you tried turning optimization on? I get about 8ms with
your code with no flags and about 2.9 with -O -inline -release.
To optimize it further you could make a sieve that only works
with odd numbers. I get (https://gist.github.com/2817289) about
1ms that way. I'm sure it is possible to do much better, but
that would probably be much more work too.
