On 6/8/12, Kagamin <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, I'm not a C++ pro, but I won't recommend to place > initializer in the header. That sounds odd. What would it mean? I > guess, it will mean definition, so chances are it's not what you > want. Initializers belong to definitions, and definitions belong > to .cpp, that's how it usually works unless you know for sure you > want something else. Bindings are just fine with declarations > alone + support code. >
Yeah I thought they might appear in an existing library in a header file but it seems they're in the definition file. Thanks for your help.
