On Wednesday, July 04, 2012 02:20:26 ixid wrote: > 0.writeln(); This works.
> 01.writeln(); This doesn't. > etc... > > Throw up a series of errors while any other number as the leading > digit seems to work fine. Why is this? It's probably an artifact of getting rid of octal literals and is clearly a bug - though you probably shouldn't be starting literals with 0 due to possible confusion with octal literals anyway (00 - 07 are permitted because they're the same in both octal and decimal, but any other number literal starting with 0 is illegal). The error you get for something like auto n = 08; is a bit off too q.d(5): Error: semicolon expected following auto declaration, not '8' - Jonathan M Davis
