On Sunday, July 22, 2012 02:34:47 Enerqi wrote: > Ok thanks! I was hoping to avoid making a copy of the arrays, > which I think std.array.join does, when treating them as a single > array range. Wishful thinking perhaps :)
It works as long as you don't need capabilities that the new range doesn't have. For instance, iterating over it works just fine without creating a new array. But it's not uncommon that if you want a random-access range, you need to allocate a new array (or some other type of container) to get it rather than using the wrapper range that you got back from a range-based function. - Jonathan M Davis
