On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 at 00:21:59 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
I'd actually argue that structs without opCmp shouldn't have
it implicitly defined. It's just begging for bugs otherwise.
For reference, this is the issue we are talking about:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3789
The current situation is totally not acceptable. Even doing
what I think you are suggesting, that is generating a
compile-time error, is better than the current situation, that
leads to silent bugs.
Bye,
bearophile
Oh, thanks. Because we were talking about sorting, and you spoke
of "comparison", I didn't get you meant comparison in the
opEquals way (as opposed to equivalence).
Thanks for taking the time to look for the bug for me.
