On Friday, August 24, 2012 01:35:56 Namespace wrote:
> > If you want something that isn't nullable, you'll need a type
> > which which
> > isn't nullable, which means using a struct. I know that you
> > want non-nullable
> > references, but for D2, the best that you're going to get is a
> > struct which
> > wraps a class.
> >
> > - Jonathan M Davis
>
> That would be fine if i only have to write:
>
> [code]
> void test(NotNullable!Foo f) {
> [/code]
>
> and not
>
> [code]
> Foo f = new Foo();
> NotNullable!Foo nf = f;
> test(nf)
> [/code]
>
> as well.
I would expect you to be able to do
test(NotNullable!Foo(new Foo));
and with a helper function, you could have something like
test(notNullable(new Foo));
- Jonathan M Davis
