On 2012-09-10 02:05, Namespace wrote:
I had never problems with that in C++.
If I have members which are const because they are assigned only one
time and needs no other assignment, why should I declare this member not
as const?
In the example I know exactly that I assign only one time a name to this
struct, so why I should not declare it as const?
Perhaps declare "Name" as private and create a property getter for the
field. I think this is a bit annoying as well, it worked in D1.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
